Predynastic Egypt

Predynastic Egypt: Egypt in the fourth millennium BCE, in which it became increasingly unified, culminating in the final unification of the country by king Narmer.

• Predynastic Egyptian Tombs
• Predynastic Egypt Art
• Predynastic Egypt Map
• Predynastic Egypt Map

Predynastic Palettes of Ancient Egypt Cosmetic and Votive palettes Cosmetic palettes, usually of siltstone (greywacke), have been found in the form of grave goods in cemeteries as early as the Badarian period (c. 5500 – 4000 BCE). Egyptian art and architecture - Egyptian art and architecture - Predynastic period: The term predynastic denotes the period of emerging cultures that preceded the establishment of the 1st dynasty in Egypt. In the 6th millennium bce there began to emerge patterns of civilization that displayed characteristics deserving to be called Egyptian. The accepted sequence of predynastic cultures is. The Predynastic Period or prehistoric period of egypt is the period that begins with the earliest record of human civilization in Egypt c. 5500, to the beginning of the Early Dynastic Period c.

The Predynastic Age

The Predynastic age (approximately the fifth and fourth millenniums BCE) is the period in Egyptian history before the unification of Upper (southern) and Lower (northern) Egypt. The main archaeological cultures of this period are called Badari (c. 4400-c.4000 BC) and Naqada (c.4000-c.3000 BCE).

Badari

The Badari Culture is named after El-Badari, a town in Middle Egypt. Based on findings discovered in Badarian tombs, one could argue that it was an egalitarian society already preoccupied with life after death, an important concept in Egyptian history. The tombs are small and made of wood. Besides grave goods, the deceased were given food to sustain them in the afterlife.

Badarian settlements were small and often temporary, with residents that were mainly involved in agriculture, keeping livestock, and fishing in the Nile. One characteristic of the Badari Culture is its exceptional thin-walled pottery.

Naqada I

The Naqada Culture, which was to replace Badari, can be divided into three phases: Naqada I (or Amritian), Naqada II (or Gerzean), and Naqada III (or Semainean). It is possible that the first Naqadans arrived from the desert, which had been subject to climatic change.^note[There is more on this subject in our article on the Libyan rock paintings.] The main centers are Abydos, Naqada, and Hierakonpolis.

Although Naqada I (c.4000-c.3500 BCE) and Badari show resemblances, Naqada I settlements were bigger and more prosperous. They were also more sedentary in nature. Possibly, the inhabitants of these settlements were the first to exploit the possibilities the Nile provided: flooding and irrigation.

Naqada II

During Naqada II (c.3500-c.3200 BCE), another important development took place: the egalitarian society evolved into a stratified society with a chieftain and an elite. During Naqada II, an important artistic motif was introduced that was to recur frequently in Egyptian art: the victorious warrior.

The increased stratification is also reflected in both the form as well as the contents of the graves, and also in the various forms of housing. There is some specialization in handicrafts, which means that at least some members of society had time for activities other than producing agricultural goods. This in turn implies labor division, a distribution network – in short, various aspects of an increasingly stratified society.

Naqada II villages were centered on the Qena bend of the Nile in Upper Egypt (southern Egypt), but larger political and religious centers such as Hierakonpolis and Abydos were also evolving. Another large center with a strong economic interest was Naqada itself. The name means “Gold City”, presumably after the local metal mines.

Naqada III

Naqada III is the final and most important phase of the Predynastic age. In this period (c.3200-c.3000 BCE), the unification of Upper Egypt and Lower Egypt took place. In addition, several recurring characteristics of Egyptian civilization were introduced during Naqada III including kingship and the conventions within Egyptian art.

Exploitation of the annual flooding of the Nile was perfected at this stage by means of well-organized irrigation. As a result, agricultural surpluses created possibilities for certain members of society to take part in other, more specialized activities. The result was a further increased stratification of society which cast its members into various roles. In addition, settlements were constantly getting bigger, and even might clash.

King Narmer

Naqada III chieftains presumably made significant steps towards the unification of Egypt. Probably, Upper Egypt was already unified at an early stage of Naqada III and ruled by one single king. Egyptologists usually call these kings 'Dynasty zero'. An interesting piece of evidence that documents the unification process is the combination of the white hedjet crown of Hierakonpolis and the red deshret crown of Naqada to the double pschent crown, which represents the unification of two nations. Later, these two nations would be identified as Upper and Lower Egypt. The two crowns would be the symbol of royal government for more than three millenniums.

The unification of Upper and Lower Egypt is traditionally attributed to one man: king Narmer. However, the Egyptian historian Manetho, who wrote in the Hellenistic age, mentions a king Menes as first king of unified Egypt. This is corroborated by the Abydos King List, which mentions a certain Meni. Traditionally, Egyptologists argue that Menes was an epithet of Narmer and both names refer to the same person.

The claim that Narmer unified Egypt is based on the most important piece of evidence we have on this subject: the Narmer Palette, which was discovered in Hierakonpolis in 1898. On the obverse side of the palette (below), king Narmer is prominently displayed at its center, wearing the white hedjet crown. His enemy is lying on the ground to his right and Narmer has grabbed him by the hair with his right hand. In his left hand, he is holding a club with which he is about to smash in his enemy’s head. Narmer has thus been depicted as “the victorious warrior”. On the reverse side of the palette, Narmer has been displayed in the top left corner at the end of what seems to be a procession. Here he is depicted wearing the red deshret crown.

On both sides of the palette, king Narmer’s name has been written in a serekh, the predecessor of the cartouche (an oval shape in which the king's name was written). The serekh is a rectangular shape that resembles a palace facade. On top of this rectangular form sits a falcon, which may be a very archaic representation of the falcon god Horus, with which the Egyptian kings were later to be associated.

Predynastic Egypt

The peoples of predynastic Egypt were the successors of the Paleolithic inhabitants of northeastern Africa, who had spread over much of its area; during wet phases they had left remains in regions as inhospitable as the Great Sand Sea. The final desiccation of the Sahara was not complete until the end of the 3rd millennium bce; over thousands of years people must have migrated from there to the Nile valley, the environment of which improved as the region dried out. In this process the decisive change from the nomadic hunter-gatherer way of life of Paleolithic times to settled agriculture has not so far been identified. Sometime after 5000 bce the raising of crops was introduced, probably on a horticultural scale, in small local cultures that seem to have penetrated southward through Egypt into the oases and the Sudan. Several of the basic food plants that were grown are native to the Middle East, so the new techniques probably spread from there. No large-scale migration need have been involved, and the cultures were at first largely self-contained. The preserved evidence for them is unrepresentative because it comes from the low desert, where relatively few people lived; as was the case later, most people probably settled in the valley and delta.

Predynastic Egyptian Tombs

Predynastic Egypt Art

The earliest known Neolithic cultures in Egypt have been found at Marimda Banī Salāma, on the southwestern edge of the delta, and farther to the southwest, in Al-Fayyūm. The site at Marimda Banī Salāma, which dates to the 6th–5th millennium bce, gives evidence of settlement and shows that cereals were grown. In Al-Fayyūm, where evidence dates to the 5th millennium bce, the settlements were near the shore of Lake Qārūn, and the settlers engaged in fishing. Marimda is a very large site that was occupied for many centuries. The inhabitants lived in lightly built huts; they may have buried their dead within their houses, but areas where burials have been found may not have been occupied by dwellings at the same time. Pottery was used in both cultures. In addition to these Egyptian Neolithic cultures, others have been identified in the Western Desert, in the Second Cataract area, and north of Khartoum. Some of these are as early as the Egyptian ones, while others overlapped with the succeeding Egyptian predynastic cultures.

In Upper Egypt, between Asyūṭ and Luxor (Al-Uqṣur), have been found the Tasian culture (named for Dayr Tāsā) and the Badarian culture (named for Al-Badārī); these date from the late 5th millennium bce. Most of the evidence for them comes from cemeteries, where the burials included fine black-topped red pottery, ornaments, some copper objects, and glazed steatite beads. The most characteristic predynastic luxury objects, slate palettes for grinding cosmetics, occur for the first time in this period. The burials show little differentiation of wealth and status and seem to belong to a peasant culture without central political organization.

Probably contemporary with both predynastic and dynastic times are thousands of rock drawings of a wide range of motifs, including boats, found throughout the Eastern Desert, in Lower Nubia, and as far west as Mount ʾUwaynāt, which stands near modern Egypt’s borders with Libya and Sudan in the southwest. The drawings show that nomads were common throughout the desert, probably to the late 3rd millennium bce, but they cannot be dated precisely; they may all have been produced by nomads, or inhabitants of the Nile valley may often have penetrated the desert and made drawings.

Naqādah I, named for the major site of Naqādah but also called Amratian for Al-ʿĀmirah, is a distinct phase that succeeded the Badarian. It has been found as far south as Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar (Hierakonpolis; ancient Egyptian Nekhen), near the sandstone barrier of Mount Silsilah, which was the cultural boundary of Egypt in predynastic times. Naqādah I differs from its Badarian predecessor in its density of settlement and the typology of its material culture but hardly at all in the social organization implied by the archaeological finds. Burials were in shallow pits in which the bodies were placed facing to the west, like those of later Egyptians. Notable types of material found in graves are fine pottery decorated with representational designs in white on red, figurines of men and women, and hard stone mace-heads that are the precursors of important late predynastic objects.

Naqādah II, also known as Gerzean for Girza (Jirza), is the most important predynastic culture. The heartland of its development was the same as that of Naqādah I, but it spread gradually throughout the country. South of Mount Silsilah, sites of the culturally similar Nubian A Group are found as far as the Second Cataract of the Nile and beyond; these have a long span, continuing as late as the Egyptian Early Dynastic period. During Naqādah II, large sites developed at Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, Naqādah, and Abydos (Abīdūs), showing by their size the concentration of settlement, as well as exhibiting increasing differentiation in wealth and status. Few sites have been identified between Asyūṭ and Al-Fayyūm, and this region may have been sparsely settled, perhaps supporting a pastoral rather than agricultural population. Near present-day Cairo—at Al-ʿUmāri, Al-Maʿādi, and Wādī Dijlah and stretching as far south as the latitude of Al-Fayyūm—are sites of a separate, contemporary culture. Al-Maʿādi was an extensive settlement that traded with the Middle East and probably acted as an intermediary for transmitting goods to the south. In this period, imports of lapis lazuli provide evidence that trade networks extended as far afield as Afghanistan.

The material culture of Naqādah II included increasing numbers of prestige objects. The characteristic mortuary pottery is made of buff desert clay, principally from around Qinā, and is decorated in red with pictures of uncertain meaning showing boats, animals, and scenes with human figures. Stone vases, many made of hard stones that come from remote areas of the Eastern Desert, are common and of remarkable quality, and cosmetic palettes display elaborate designs, with outlines in the form of animals, birds, or fish. Flint was worked with extraordinary skill to produce large ceremonial knives of a type that continued in use during dynastic times.

Predynastic Egypt Map

Sites of late Naqādah II (sometimes termed Naqādah III) are found throughout Egypt, including the Memphite area and the delta region, and appear to have replaced the local Lower Egyptian cultures. Links with the Middle East intensified, and some distinctively Mesopotamian motifs and objects were briefly in fashion in Egypt. The cultural unification of the country probably accompanied a political unification, but this must have proceeded in stages and cannot be reconstructed in detail. In an intermediate stage, local states may have formed at Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, Naqādah, and Abydos and in the delta at such sites as Buto (modern Kawm al-Farāʿīn) and Sais (Ṣā al-Ḥajar). Ultimately, Abydos became preeminent; its late predynastic cemetery of Umm al-Qaʿāb was extended to form the burial place of the kings of the 1st dynasty. In the latest predynastic period, objects bearing written symbols of royalty were deposited throughout the country, and primitive writing also appeared in marks on pottery. Because the basic symbol for the king, a falcon on a decorated palace facade, hardly varies, these objects are thought to have belonged to a single line of kings or a single state, not to a set of small states. This symbol became the royal Horus name, the first element in a king’s titulary, which presented the reigning king as the manifestation of an aspect of the god Horus, the leading god of the country. Over the next few centuries several further definitions of the king’s presence were added to this one.

Thus, at this time Egypt seems to have been a state unified under kings who introduced writing and the first bureaucratic administration. These kings, who could have ruled for more than a century, may correspond with a set of names preserved on the Palermo Stone, but no direct identification can be made between them. The latest was probably Narmer, whose name has been found near Memphis, at Abydos, on a ceremonial palette and mace-head from Al-Kawm al-Aḥmar, and at the Palestinian sites of Tall Gat and ʿArad. The relief scenes on the palette show him wearing the two chief crowns of Egypt and defeating northern enemies, but these probably are stereotyped symbols of the king’s power and role and not records of specific events of his reign. They demonstrate that the position of the king in society and its presentation in mixed pictorial and written form had been elaborated by the early 3rd millennium bce.

Predynastic Egypt Map

During this time Egyptian artistic style and conventions were formulated, together with writing. The process led to a complete and remarkably rapid transformation of material culture, so that many dynastic Egyptian prestige objects hardly resembled their forerunners.